Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

nanomq: 0.20.8 → 0.21.8 #284345

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

nanomq: 0.20.8 → 0.21.8 #284345

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

sikmir
Copy link
Member

@sikmir sikmir commented Jan 27, 2024

Description of changes

https://github.com/nanomq/nanomq/releases

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 24.05 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 and 23.11 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@sikmir
Copy link
Member Author

sikmir commented Jan 27, 2024

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 284345 run on x86_64-linux 1

1 package built:
  • nanomq

@sikmir sikmir changed the title nanomq: 0.20.8 → 0.21 nanomq: 0.20.8 → 0.21.2 Feb 10, 2024
@sikmir sikmir force-pushed the nanomq branch 3 times, most recently from 5b0eb04 to d2f967d Compare February 21, 2024 18:42
@sikmir sikmir changed the title nanomq: 0.20.8 → 0.21.2 nanomq: 0.20.8 → 0.21.6 Feb 22, 2024
@sikmir sikmir force-pushed the nanomq branch 2 times, most recently from befff86 to d618192 Compare March 5, 2024 04:49
@sikmir sikmir force-pushed the nanomq branch 2 times, most recently from d6cc10c to a233029 Compare March 19, 2024 18:51
@sikmir sikmir changed the title nanomq: 0.20.8 → 0.21.6 nanomq: 0.20.8 → 0.21.7 Mar 23, 2024
@sikmir
Copy link
Member Author

sikmir commented Mar 23, 2024

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 284345 run on x86_64-darwin 1

1 package built:
  • nanomq

@sikmir
Copy link
Member Author

sikmir commented Mar 23, 2024

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 284345 run on x86_64-linux 1

1 package built:
  • nanomq

@sikmir
Copy link
Member Author

sikmir commented Mar 23, 2024

I have no idea why local builds is OK on linux/darwin, but CI fails.

@nixos-discourse
Copy link

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/3676

];

env.NIX_CFLAGS_COMPILE = lib.optionalString stdenv.cc.isClang "-Wno-return-type -Wno-implicit-function-declaration -Wno-error=implicit-int";
env.NIX_CFLAGS_COMPILE = lib.optionalString stdenv.cc.isClang "-Wno-error=int-conversion";

# disabled by default - not 100% reliable and making nanomq depend on
# mosquitto would annoy people
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nanaomq is not executing tests and they are failing for ofborg.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you mean ofborg tries to execute withInstallChecks?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am not sure exactly what ofborg is doing. You can take a look at logs by clicking details below.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Running phase: fixupPhase
shrinking RPATHs of ELF executables and libraries in /nix/store/p51fx920kwbhz1wfd82y3d716j16q186-nanomq-0.21.8
shrinking /nix/store/p51fx920kwbhz1wfd82y3d716j16q186-nanomq-0.21.8/bin/nanomq_cli
shrinking /nix/store/p51fx920kwbhz1wfd82y3d716j16q186-nanomq-0.21.8/bin/nanomq
shrinking /nix/store/p51fx920kwbhz1wfd82y3d716j16q186-nanomq-0.21.8/bin/nngcat
checking for references to /build/ in /nix/store/p51fx920kwbhz1wfd82y3d716j16q186-nanomq-0.21.8...
patching script interpreter paths in /nix/store/p51fx920kwbhz1wfd82y3d716j16q186-nanomq-0.21.8
stripping (with command strip and flags -S -p) in  /nix/store/p51fx920kwbhz1wfd82y3d716j16q186-nanomq-0.21.8/lib /nix/store/p51fx920kwbhz1wfd82y3d716j16q186-nanomq-0.21.8/bin
Running phase: installCheckPhase
mqtt v311 test start
V4/V5 test passed!
clean session test passed!
Retain test passed!
mqtt v311 test end
mqtt v5 test start
User property test passed!
Shared subscription test passed!
Sub client did not receive message * 10
mosquitto_sub -h 127.0.0.1 -p 1883 -t 'topic'
mosquitto_pub -h 127.0.0.1 -p 1883 -t topic -V 5 -m message -D Publish topic-alias 10 -d --repeat 10
Topic alias test failed!
mqtt v5 test failed
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4593] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1645: payload: [message], len = 7
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4593] DEBUG /build/source/nng/src/supplemental/nanolib/mqtt_db.c:734: Searching client: topic
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4593] DEBUG /build/source/nng/src/supplemental/nanolib/mqtt_db.c:737: Searching client: topic
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4598] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1190: pipe_info size: [2]
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4602] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1610: property len: 3
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4602] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1633: used pos: [6]
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4602] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1645: payload: [message], len = 7
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4602] DEBUG /build/source/nng/src/supplemental/nanolib/mqtt_db.c:734: Searching client: topic
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4602] DEBUG /build/source/nng/src/supplemental/nanolib/mqtt_db.c:737: Searching client: topic
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4602] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1190: pipe_info size: [2]
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4602] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/apps/broker.c:548: WAIT ^^^^ ctx83 ^^^^
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4602] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1351: start encode message
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4602] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1388: after topic and id len in msg already [7]
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4602] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1448: after payload len in msg already [18]
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4602] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1458: header len [2] remain len [18]
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4602] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1510: end encode message
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4598] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/apps/broker.c:548: WAIT ^^^^ ctx78 ^^^^
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4598] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1351: start encode message
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4600] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1645: payload: [message], len = 7
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4600] DEBUG /build/source/nng/src/supplemental/nanolib/mqtt_db.c:734: Searching client: topic
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4600] DEBUG /build/source/nng/src/supplemental/nanolib/mqtt_db.c:737: Searching client: topic
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4598] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1388: after topic and id len in msg already [7]
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4598] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1448: after payload len in msg already [18]
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4598] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1458: header len [2] remain len [18]
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4598] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1510: end encode message
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4591] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1510: end encode message
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4600] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1190: pipe_info size: [2]
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4591] DEBUG /build/source/nng/src/sp/protocol/mqtt/nmq_mqtt.c:452: pipe 539152686 occupied! resending in cb!
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4606] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/apps/broker.c:548: WAIT ^^^^ ctx80 ^^^^
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4606] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1351: start encode message
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4606] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1388: after topic and id len in msg already [7]
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4606] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1448: after payload len in msg already [18]
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4593] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1190: pipe_info size: [2]
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4606] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1458: header len [2] remain len [18]
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4606] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1510: end encode message
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4601] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/apps/broker.c:548: WAIT ^^^^ ctx84 ^^^^
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4601] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1351: start encode message
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4601] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1388: after topic and id len in msg already [7]
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4601] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1448: after payload len in msg already [18]
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4601] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1458: header len [2] remain len [18]
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4601] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1510: end encode message
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4602] DEBUG /build/source/nng/src/sp/protocol/mqtt/nmq_mqtt.c:430: Drop msg due to qos == 0
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4602] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1286: free topic
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4602] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1293: free properties
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4602] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1302: free payload
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4602] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1308: free pub_packet
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4602] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:88: pub_handler: init pipe_info
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4598] DEBUG /build/source/nng/src/sp/protocol/mqtt/nmq_mqtt.c:430: Drop msg due to qos == 0
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4598] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1286: free topic
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4598] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1293: free properties
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4598] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1302: free payload
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4598] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1308: free pub_packet
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4598] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:88: pub_handler: init pipe_info
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4591] DEBUG /build/source/nng/src/sp/protocol/mqtt/nmq_mqtt.c:430: Drop msg due to qos == 0
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4591] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1286: free topic
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4591] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1293: free properties
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4591] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1302: free payload
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4591] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1308: free pub_packet
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4591] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:88: pub_handler: init pipe_info
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4601] DEBUG /build/source/nng/src/sp/protocol/mqtt/nmq_mqtt.c:452: pipe 539152686 occupied! resending in cb!
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4606] DEBUG /build/source/nng/src/sp/protocol/mqtt/nmq_mqtt.c:430: Drop msg due to qos == 0
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4606] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1286: free topic
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4606] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1293: free properties
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4606] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1302: free payload
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4606] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1308: free pub_packet
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4606] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:88: pub_handler: init pipe_info
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4601] DEBUG /build/source/nng/src/sp/protocol/mqtt/nmq_mqtt.c:430: Drop msg due to qos == 0
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4601] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1286: free topic
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4601] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1293: free properties
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4601] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1302: free payload
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4601] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:1308: free pub_packet
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4601] DEBUG /build/source/nanomq/pub_handler.c:88: pub_handler: init pipe_info
2024-05-01 09:20:13 [4604] DEBUG /build/source/nng/src/sp/protocol/mqtt/nmq_mqtt.c:235: check pipe keepalive interval 60 backoff -90000.000000, ka 0
2024-05-01 09:20:14 [4595] DEBUG /build/source/nng/src/sp/protocol/mqtt/nmq_mqtt.c:235: check pipe keepalive interval 60 backoff -89000.000000, ka 1
2024-05-01 09:20:15 [4596] DEBUG /build/source/nng/src/sp/protocol/mqtt/nmq_mqtt.c:235: check pipe keepalive interval 60 backoff -88000.000000, ka 2
2024-05-01 09:20:16 [4600] DEBUG /build/source/nng/src/sp/protocol/mqtt/nmq_mqtt.c:235: check pipe keepalive interval 60 backoff -87000.000000, ka 3
2024-05-01 09:20:17 [4592] DEBUG /build/source/nng/src/sp/protocol/mqtt/nmq_mqtt.c:235: check pipe keepalive interval 60 backoff -86000.000000, ka 4
2024-05-01 09:20:18 [4585] ERROR /build/source/nanomq/apps/broker.c:104: signal signumber: 15 received!
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/build/source/.github/scripts/test.py", line 55, in <module>
    raise AssertionError
AssertionError
error: builder for '/nix/store/ql2biqwv56k0cc78il7zn097axdni33f-nanomq-0.21.8.drv' failed with exit code 1;

@risicle risicle changed the title nanomq: 0.20.8 → 0.21.7 nanomq: 0.20.8 → 0.21.8 May 10, 2024
@risicle
Copy link
Contributor

risicle commented May 10, 2024

0.21.8 addresses CVE-2024-25767

A "pre-release" 0.21.9 also addresses CVE-2024-31040 & CVE-2024-31041, but it's unclear how they treat "pre-releases". Might be better to add a patch for those?

@risicle
Copy link
Contributor

risicle commented May 10, 2024

I think the tests might need paho-mqtt 2.x which there are attempts to bump to @ #288219

@risicle
Copy link
Contributor

risicle commented Jul 7, 2024

It does actually look like websocket support might be properly broken - even given an updated paho-mqtt, the websocket functional tests give "connection refused" for everything.

We're going to have to decide whether we want to bump to a possibly partially broken nanomq or mark this with knownVunerabilties

@risicle risicle mentioned this pull request Jul 7, 2024
13 tasks
@sikmir sikmir closed this Jul 9, 2024
@sikmir sikmir deleted the nanomq branch July 9, 2024 16:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants